At-Bay accelerates cyber insurance underwriting decisions to under 2 minutes with Censys internet intelligence
A documented Underwriting Automation in Specialty Lines deployment at At-Bay, with source-attributed results and missing evidence labelled explicitly.
Evidence at a glance
- Evidence status:
- Automated evidence gate passed
- Deployment timeframe:
- Not reported by source
- Reported outcome metrics:
- 1 cited below
- Directory entry published:
The source-link check confirms reachability, not independent re-verification of every claim.
Source-reported figures — cited source: censys.com
The Challenge
At-Bay operates in the specialty cyber insurance market, where underwriting accuracy depends on understanding a policyholder's real-time internet exposure — open ports, misconfigured services, unpatched software, and shadow IT. Traditional underwriting workflows relied on static questionnaires and point-in-time assessments that quickly became outdated, leaving insurers blind to evolving attack surfaces. For a cyber insurer writing policies at scale, slow or inaccurate risk assessment translates directly into mispriced premiums and adverse loss ratios. The inability to continuously monitor insured organizations meant At-Bay could not maintain the data-driven underwriting discipline the cyber insurance line demands.
The Solution
At-Bay embedded Censys internet intelligence into its core underwriting technology stack, replacing manual or incomplete risk signals with continuous, automated scanning of policyholders' internet-facing assets. Censys was selected over competing attack surface management tools specifically for its scanning reliability and asset coverage accuracy — qualities that directly affect underwriting model inputs. The integration feeds real-time exposure data into At-Bay's predictive ML models, which evaluate risk signals across each insured organization's external footprint. This architecture supports recurring, automated scans rather than one-time assessments, meaning the underwriting engine receives fresh data throughout the policy lifecycle and can flag material risk changes as they emerge.
Results
The integration reduced At-Bay's underwriting decision time to under 2 minutes — a threshold that redefines what automated cyber insurance processing looks like at the carrier level. Beyond speed, the continuous scanning capability means risk assessments remain current rather than reflecting a moment frozen at application time.
- Decision time: Under 2 minutes per underwriting determination
- Coverage: Continuous, recurring scans of insured organizations' internet-exposed assets
- Process change: Automated risk assessment replaced manual, questionnaire-driven workflows
The result is a repeatable, scalable underwriting process that positions At-Bay to grow its book without a proportional increase in underwriting headcount.
Key Takeaways
- Data quality is the underwriting model. In automated cyber underwriting, the accuracy of your internet intelligence provider directly determines policy pricing quality — vendor selection is a core actuarial decision, not a procurement one.
- Recurring scans outperform point-in-time assessments. Cyber risk changes continuously; underwriting systems that only capture initial exposure miss material changes mid-policy.
- Speed and accuracy are not trade-offs when the underlying data infrastructure is sound — sub-2-minute decisions become achievable without sacrificing risk rigor.
- Integration with existing ML pipelines matters. Feeding external intelligence into predictive models requires reliable, structured data outputs from the scanning layer.
Explore Related
Details
- Industry
- Specialty Lines
- Use Case
- Underwriting Automation
- AI Technology
- Predictive ML
- Company Size
- SME
- Company
- At-Bay
- Evidence status
- Automated evidence gate passed
- Deployment timeframe
- Not reported by source
- Directory entry published
Cited source
censys.comHave a similar implementation?
Share your customer's AI results and link it to your vendor profile.
Submit a case study →